Defence & Foreign Policy Opinion Politics & Protest

Why swap freedom for the One Country, Two Systems myth? The world must support brave Taiwan

At the beginning of this year, China’s President Xi Jinping issued a veiled threat to Taiwan, saying that it “must and will be” reunited with mainland China and that the island’s de facto independence could not continue forever.

As a proposed compromise, he offered Taiwan the One Country, Two Systems principle. Yet it is strikingly and strangely ironic that he should offer this model to Taiwan at precisely the same time that he is dismantling One Country, Two Systems in all but name in Hong Kong.

one country two systems

File Photo: Gene Lin/HKFP.

When Hong Kong was handed over to China from British colonial rule almost 22 years ago, it had the values of a democratic society — basic freedoms, human rights, the rule of law – without the full system of democracy, universal suffrage. Under Hong Kong’s Basic Law, universal suffrage was promised, but it now seems an even more distant dream than ever. Hong Kong today is fighting to preserve its most basic freedoms.

Taiwan, in contrast, is a vibrant, flourishing democracy with full universal suffrage. It has transitioned from dictatorship to democracy in an impressive way.

Last month, I visited Taiwan for the first time in two decades to attend a conference on freedom of religion or belief in the region. Organised by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, the conference was addressed by Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen and Deputy Foreign Minister Szu-chien Hsu.

President Tsai delivered a powerful speech extolling the virtues of human rights and freedom. Religious freedom, in particular, means, she said, that “the state does not try to control religious organisations. It also means that governments creates an environment of tolerance and acceptance, and a respect for minorities and diversity.”

That, she added, was what brought those of us who cherish freedom together. “We are not separated by our different beliefs but bound together by this shared tolerance and acceptance of one another’s differences,” she argued. “So we can work together — believers and non-believers alike — to meet the challenges of the 21st century… freedom of religion has become central to our democratic way of life.”

Tsai Ing-wen

Tsai Ing-wen. File photo: Flickr/presidentialoffice.

President Tsai’s speech put down a marker: “Anyone can contribute a chapter to the story of Taiwan,” she said. Yet how about across the straits? “In countries where human rights and democratic values are suppressed,” she added, without naming them, “governments engage in discrimination and violence against people who simply want to follow their faith.”

“In those countries, religious organisations are being persecuted, religious statues and icons are being destroyed, religious leaders are forced into exile, and people are held in re-education camps and forced to break their religious taboos.”

“Taiwan knows how it feels when someone tries to take away your rights, wipe away your identity and challenge your way of life. So we choose to stand with those who were oppressed and whose religious rights were taken away by authoritarian regimes.”

Not only did President Tsai deliver a keynote speech at a conference that, frankly, few other heads of government around the world would have had the imagination and conviction to attend, but she praised another distinguished human rights champion in the room, the United States’ ambassador-at-large for international religious freedom, Sam Brownback, who only days before had delivered a powerful speech in Hong Kong in which he accused China’s dictatorship of being “at war with faith.”

Brownback had said that “it is a war they will not win”. What, after all, he asked, does the Chinese Communist Party have to fear? “Why can’t it trust its people with a Bible? Why can’t Uighur children be named Mohammed? Why can’t the Tibetans choose and venerate their own religious leaders like they have for more than a thousand years?” The ambassador repeated that challenge in Taipei.

Sam Brownback

United States Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, Sam Brownback. Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr.

Not only did President Tsai attend a conference on religious freedom. Not only did she deliver a speech. And not only did she applaud Sam Brownback.

At the end of the two-day conference, and after a private meeting with Ambassador Brownback, her government announced that it was appointing a special ambassador for international religious freedom and would be donating US$200,000 a year for five years to an international religious freedom fund. No delegate at the conference expected that — and Taiwan deserves widespread applause.

After the conference, I had meetings with Taiwanese government officials. I was invited to give a 30-minute presentation, followed by an hour-long discussion, on human rights in China and the region. What other government in the world gives a human rights activist nearly two hours in its foreign ministry on such a sensitive topic?

Then I went to Radio Taiwan International and Formosa TV. I was told my radio interview would go out on 10 different frequencies throughout mainland China to millions of listeners. What other free media has that reach into perhaps the most repressive regime in the world today?

And I met my friends at the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy. A foundation. For democracy. In a Chinese-speaking environment. For the region. Why wouldn’t we want to work with it?

In addition, I met the inspiring, remarkable Lin Fei-fan, who led Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement in 2014 against closer ties with the Chinese regime at the same time as brave Hong Kong people peacefully protested for freedom in the Umbrella Movement.

Lin Fei-fan

Lin Fei-fan. File Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

And I met Lin Ching-yu, the young, courageous, gracious, dignified and steely wife of Taiwanese human rights activist Li Ming-che, who was abducted and jailed in China two years ago: “Even in prison, my husband is a human rights activist, and he wants the world to speak out, not only for his freedom but for all prisoners of conscience in China,” she told me as she looked at me piercingly. “The last time I saw him, he told me: ‘Go everywhere and tell everyone.'”

Right now, Taiwan is a beacon for democracy in Asia. Why on earth would the people of Taiwan want to swap their hard-won freedoms for the myth of One Country, Two Systems? When I was asked on Radio Taiwan International about the difference between mainland China and Taiwan, I replied quite simply that when China is embarking on its worst crackdown on religion since the Cultural Revolution, and Taiwan is holding conferences on religious freedom and appointing a special ambassador for the issue, it’s the difference between night and day.

That prompted the question: if mainland China is “night” and Taiwan is “day,” where is Hong Kong? Without batting an eyelid, my response was “dusk.” Maybe that is too optimistic.

They say of a woman that, if she is married, she stands by her man. In my view, if it believes in freedom and human dignity, the world must stand by Taiwan.

This op-ed originally appeared on La Coix International.


Kong Tsung-gan‘s new collection of essays – narrative, journalistic, documentary, analytical, polemical, and philosophical – trace the fast-paced, often bewildering developments in Hong Kong since the 2014 Umbrella Movement. As Long As There Is Resistance, There Is Hope is available exclusively through HKFP with a min. HK$200 donation. Thanks to the kindness of the author, 100 per cent of your payment will go to HKFP’s critical 2019 #PressForFreedom Funding Drive.

funding drive press for freedom kong tsung-gan

Why swap freedom for the One Country, Two Systems myth? The world must support brave Taiwan