By Mong Palatino.
To educate younger generations about the horrors of war, particularly the bitter experience of thousands of Singaporeans during the Japanese occupation from 1942 to 1945, Singapore’s government opened a new exhibition on February 16, which it initially named “Syonan Gallery: War and Its Legacies.”
A day after the opening, however, the government changed the gallery’s name to “Surviving the Japanese Occupation: War and Its Legacies.”
Many people reminded the authorities that “Syonan-To,” which means “light of the south,” was the name used by the Imperial Japanese Army when it occupied Singapore during World War II. Many felt the decision to revive the name was an insult to thousands who suffered during the Japanese occupation.
The National Library Board, which operates the gallery, explained why it chose the name Syonan: “The new name of the gallery reminds us how brittle our sovereignty can be, as Singapore lost not only its freedom but also its name during the Japanese Occupation.”
But writer Tan Wah Piow questioned why the gallery was opened on the anniversary of Japan’s invasion of Singapore: “It is… bizarre to time the opening of the Syonan Gallery on the day Japan conquered Singapore.”
“To complete the joke, the Singapore government might as well invite the lunatic fringe of the Japanese ultra-right to officiate the opening of the museum.”
Vernon Chan urged the government to broaden the theme of the World War II gallery: “Why is the image of the surrender to the Japanese more prominent in our historical memory than the image of the Japanese surrender? How about stressing the importance of treaties and allies in a multipolar world?”
— ST Opinion (@STopinion) February 18, 2017
“How about honouring our allies from the war – including the communists, KMT, British, Australians, and Americans who jointly pooled their resources to liberating Malaya and Borneo?” wrote Vernon.
“How about recognising that in a world war, territory can be lost and regained – and the ‘fall of Singapore’ should be balanced with the ‘liberation of Singapore’?”
Veteran journalist P N Balji wrote that the issue demonstrates how the government has failed to understand the sentiment of the country’s older population: “It points to one disturbing fact: that the people running the government machinery are losing touch with an important segment of society.”
“Older citizens are a vote bank the government will ignore at its own peril,” he wrote.
After hearing the criticisms raised by many citizens, Minister for Communications and Information Yaacob Ibrahim apologised for using the name Syonan. He also announced that the gallery will be given a new name.
“Far from expressing approval of the Japanese Occupation, our intention was to remember what our forefathers went through, commemorate the generation of Singaporeans who experienced the Japanese Occupation, and reaffirm our collective commitment never to let this happen again,” said Ibrahim.
“This was never our intention, and I am sorry for the pain the name has causedose who suffered terribly and lost family members during the Japanese Occupation.”
After Ibrahim’s announcement, the name Syonan was removed in front of the museum. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong also confirmed that the gallery will no longer be called Syonan.
“Many Singaporeans of all races suffered terrible atrocities during the Japanese Occupation, or had family members who did,” said Lee.
“My colleagues and I honour and respect these deep feelings. So we have renamed the exhibition to bear witness to these painful memories.”
This article originally appeared on Global Voices.