Lawmaker Eddie Chu Hoi-dick joined over 20 activists from the Wang Chau Green Belt Development Concern Group to stage a protest on Tuesday criticising the government for ignoring the effect of the controversial Wang Chau development project on three non-indigenous villages. They also said that the heavily redacted reports released in response to the land controversy did not reflect the truth and say they were dissatisfied that the three villages were not consulted in the process.
The government also did not conduct an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report, which is required, Chu claimed.
The protesters asked the government to shelve the plan and called for “no moving, no demolition” stance. They also said that development was only serving the powerful, and asked for the full report to be disclosed.
The Yuen Long District Council was holding a meeting that day to discuss whether it would request that the government conduct a public consultation on the Wang Chau development plans. Yuen Long District Council Chairman Shum Ho-kit received the protesters’ letter of petition.
The project originally intended to create 17,000 public housing units. However, Phases 2 and 3, which involved the construction of 13,000 units on a brownfield site occupied by a rural strongman’s car park, was postponed. The first phase, which aimed to build 4,000 flats on a green-belt site occupied by non-indigenous villages was given the go-ahead. It is unknown when the 13,000 units will be built, if at all.
Chu told reporters that the project needed to conduct three EIA reports as required by law – one on roads, another on sewage systems, and finally on the industrial estate. However, he said that no such reports were completed in 2014-2015. “If they are only building Phase 1, they probably think they don’t have to do a legally required EIA report, he said.
But “they admitted to the public that they have not given up [on the other phases],” he said.
He also said although the government said they conducted reports up until 2015, the last report he saw was from May of 2014.
The scale of the project may be scaled back further, as rural leaders object to the project hurting the area’s feng shui – a Chinese philosophical system relating to harmony with the environment. The phase of 4,000 units will be close to hillside graves.
Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying is also directly involved as he was the chairman of a task force on the project. Leung said that he made the decision to conduct the project in separate phases in January 2014, after the housing bureau suggested it to him. The housing bureau made the suggestion after two informal meetings with rural leaders in July and September 2013. There were no records of minutes of the third informal meeting in March 2014.
The rural leaders informally consulted were former Yuen Long District Council chairman and lawmaker Leung Che-cheung, district councillor Tang Hing-ip, Ping Shan Rural Committee chairman Tsang Shu-wo, vice-chairman Tang Tat-sin and Heung Yee Kuk councillor Tang Chi-keung. Villagers living on the greenbelt site were not consulted.
Henry Cheng Kar-Shun, chief of New World, is a supporter of Leung Chun-ying. The government did not take back a nearby greenbelt site owned by developer New World for the public housing project. New World instead applied for a change of land zoning to build private housing after the public housing proposal was approved by the district council. The private housing project may share driveways and a roundabout with the public housing project, according to plans.
Incoming lawmaker Eddie Chu Hoi-dick has claimed that there was collusion between the government, businesses, rural groups and triads.
The incident could harm Leung’s chance of running for re-election.